appeal - Housing developers and planning conditions warning from Cheshire East Council

Cheshire East Council is sitting on more than £33 million of section 106 money from developers, with some money dating back from a planning application 28 years ago, writes Ethan Davies.

A freedom of information request has revealed the authority currently has a staggering £33,428,764 in unspent funds, having collected £39.7 million of such contributions since 2010.

Nantwich News revealed back in 2015 that the authority then had more than £14 million sitting in its coffers unspent.

That’s now increased by a massive £19 million in just five years.

Section 106 contributions are a condition placed on developers when housing schemes are approved, and should be spent on improving infrastructure such as roads, schools, parks and community facilities.

The authority defended the revelation today, claiming the money “will be spent in due course”.

But the amount will anger many in areas where schools are over-subscribed, roads in poor condition, and public transport suffering cut backs.

In one case, £35,000 of Section 106 contributions has been sitting unspent from an application back in 1992 – an extension to the former Cheshire Building Society offices on Castle Street, Macclesfield.

The application was submitted to CEC’s predecessor, Macclesfield Municipal Borough, in 1992 and approved a year later and currently has £35,000 unspent from its agreement.

Other successful applications with contributions left to be exhausted from the 1990s include a 1998 bid to construct townhouses in Handforth, and a medium density housing project off Hamble Way in Macclesfield from the same year.

The Handforth project has £113,000 left to be used, whereas Hamble Way has just over £10,000 remaining.

“As a large unitary authority, Cheshire East Council is responsible for many development projects across the borough, a number of which deliver financial contributions of ultimate benefit to local communities,” a spokesperson told the LDRS.

“Most developer contributions are linked to a specific development project, in accordance with the legal agreements between the council and the developer.

“Where S106 money is directed towards specific community projects, such as recreational and leisure facilities or more substantial projects, such as associated highways improvements, there are a number of steps to be followed before those projects can be implemented.

“These can include planning applications – outline and detailed – project planning, consultation with residents, town and parish councils and – where work is being carried out by the council – an appropriate timetable for that work to take place.

“In view of the scale of new housing developments and other schemes in Cheshire East, there will always be a pot of S106 contributions which are ring-fenced for specific projects.

“The sum of £33m may appear to be large but those monies are allocated and will be spent in due course.

“Legal agreements (or legal obligations) fall under Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act and can be of benefit to all local authorities and communities affected by housing or commercial developments that call for some mitigation.”


  1. Chris Moorhouse says:

    It would be interesting to know how many real affordable rented homes have been provided since CEC came into existence. Also, proactive Councils provide funding, sites etc to help, again would like to know what has CEC done?

  2. Richard Hamilton says:

    S106 money is ring fenced and time related. Generally to be spent within 5 or 10 years of receipt otherwise to be refunded to the developer. CEC sitting on S106 highway contributions from Elworth Hall Farm in Sandbach for 4 years despite repeated calls for the work to be carried out. £100,000 highways contribution lying unspent and works not even designed from a S106 contribution on Congleton Road, Sandabach. £100,000’s lying unspent from other developments at Albion Lock, Hawthorne Drive, and Abbeyfields, all in Sandbach. CEC responsible for carrying out the works, not the developer. Scandal.

  3. Why are the councils even in possession of this money? should be lodged in a governing body to ensure this is spent within a time frame. It is no wonder the area has so many foot path and road faults

  4. And cheshire east still cut essential services and say they wont spend money fighting the travesty of democracy over the nantwich south approval. appalling council not fit for purpose. Bring back CNBC

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website, to learn more please read our privacy policy.


Captcha * Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.